﻿<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "cch-tei.dtd" >
<TEI.2 id="paper33">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Inscriptions of Aphrodisias: Paradigm of an Electronic Publication</title>
            <author><name reg="Bodard, Gabriel">Gabriel Bodard</name></author>
         </titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <publisher>Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London - Marked up to
               be included in the CLiP 2006 Conference Abstracts book.</publisher>
            <address>
               <addrLine>Strand, London WC2R 2LS, England, United Kingdom. Tel:+44 (0) 20 7848 2684</addrLine>
        <addrLine>http://www.kcl.ac.uk/cch/</addrLine>
      </address>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <p>No source: created in electronic format.</p>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <profileDesc>
         <langUsage>
            <language id="eng">English</language>
         </langUsage>
         <textClass>
            <classCode>paper</classCode>
            <keywords>
               <list>
                  <item>Ancient Greek</item>
                  <item>electronic publication</item>
                  <item>philology</item>
                  <item>archaeology</item>

               </list>
            </keywords>
         </textClass>
      </profileDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <change>
            <date>2006-06-06</date>
            <respStmt>
               <name>MK</name>
            </respStmt>
            <item>minor changes</item>
         </change>
         <change>
            <date>2006-06-02</date>
            <respStmt>
               <name>MK</name>
            </respStmt>
            <item>minor changes</item>
         </change>
         <change>
            <date>2006-04-21</date>
            <respStmt>
               <name>EL</name>
            </respStmt>
            <item>created XML doc</item>
         </change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>

   <text>
      <front>
         <docTitle>
            <titlePart lang="eng">Inscriptions of Aphrodisias: Paradigm of an Electronic
            Publication</titlePart>
         </docTitle>
         <docAuthor>
            <name reg="Bodard, Gabriel">Gabriel Bodard</name>
            <address>
               <addrLine><xref type="email" url="gabriel.bodard@kcl.ac.uk">gabriel.bodard@kcl.ac.uk</xref></addrLine><addrLine type="affiliation">King's College London</addrLine>
               <addrLine>London</addrLine>
               <addrLine>United Kingdom</addrLine>
            </address>
         </docAuthor>



      </front>
      <group>
         <text lang="eng">
            <body>
               <head>Inscriptions of Aphrodisias: Paradigm of an Electronic Publication</head>
               <p>Inscriptions, as studied by epigraphers, ancient texts inscribed on stone or other
                  durable materials, are an important source of access to various ancient societies,
                  and particularly the worlds of Ancient Greece and Rome. The conventional
                  publication of inscriptions has however tended to keep them in an academic
                  limbo — not quite literary text and not quite archaeological object. By publishing
                  the Inscriptions of Aphrodisias<note>Available online: <title><xref url="http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/">Inscriptions of Aphrodisias</xref></title>; and
                     especially at this point the pilot publication Roueché, Charlotte, 2004. <title><xref url="http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/ala2004/">Aphrodisias in Late Antiquity</xref></title>,
                     revised electronic edition.</note> — a corpus of over two thousand texts, mostly
                  in Greek, and from a single, marble-rich city in Asia Minor spanning nearly a
                  thousand years — in electronic format, we are taking the opportunities offered by
                  the medium for a radical reappraisal of this body of material, setting it both in
                  a literary and in an archaeological context.<note>cf. Roueché, Charlotte, 1989.
                        <title level="m">Aphrodisias in Late Antiquity</title>. London: Roman
                     Society Monographs for some of the same material in transitional paper
                  format.</note></p>
               <p>I have identified six primary advantages of electronic over traditional
                  publication: accessibility; absence of size and space restrictions; use of new
                  media; hyperlinking and interactive materials; ability to update and correct
                  publication; accuracy and verifiability of reference materials.<note>The
                     implications of electronic publication have been widely discussed (especially
                     in the hard sciences), see e.g. Marnett, L. 2005. <title level="a">The impact
                        of electronic publication</title>
                     <title level="j">Chemical Research in Toxicology </title>18: 1-2; Kasdorf, W.
                     2003. <title level="m">The Columbia guide to digital publishing</title>.
                     Columbia University Press; ALPSP (ed.), 2002. <title level="m">Authors and
                        electronic publishing</title>; Clarke, J. 2001. <title level="a">Questions
                        raised by electronic publication in archaeology</title>, <title level="s">BAR International Series</title> 931: 351-6. My six categories are
                     referenced in conference papers, teaching materials, and site documentation,
                     but currently unpublished.</note> Of these areas, the greatest advantages to
                  the project of epigraphic reappraisal are to be gained from increased size and
                  space, new media, and hypertext (although the improved accessibility also makes
                  the inscriptions available to a wider audience than usual).</p>
               <p>The availability of near-unlimited space has significant impact on the
                  possibilities for the nature of the publication of this corpus. At the simplest
                  level, as compared to a book which will include relatively few, black-and-white
                  images of inscriptions, focusing by necessity on the face of the stone and the
                  letters themselves, the web publication is unlimited as to the number of useful
                  photographs that can be presented. The site includes images in colour and in high
                  resolution, of all sides of the inscribed object and its physical context, as well
                  as scans of squeezes, sketches, and notebooks reporting the original condition of
                  the text. Addition significance of the increased space available can be found in
                  our ability in this publication to provide multiple presentations of the content
                  text. Not only can we display a choice of diplomatic and interpretive editions of
                  the Greek (with the underlying XML also accessible for view or download), but the
                  materials can be presented in a range of outputs focussing on different aspects of
                  the analysis. Two outputs might place different emphases on the philological and
                  archaeological contexts, for example. Rather than a single table of contents and
                  linear presentation of the inscriptions, the corpus is accessible via several
                  tables of contents and a couple of dozen indices and bibliographical concordances,
                  allowing readers to choose their route through the material.</p>
               <p>The good, colour images mentioned above are one example of new media that the
                  electronic medium allows us to publish. Another is the use of scalable and linked
                  maps and plans, including archaeological plans encoded in SVG, with a range of
                  information about findspots and locations of inscribed objects embedded within
                  them.</p>
               <p>The advantages of hypertext in an electronic publication are many, and include the
                  ability to link internally within the text, making cross-references easier to
                  follow up (and return from), and the navigation within a user-defined route
                  through the publication. In addition, and in particular in this case, the ability
                  to hyperlink to external objects is of great value to the project of this
                  publication. We have been able to refer readers directly to other textual sources,
                  encyclopedias, and prosopographies for comparison or further information, and to
                  the archaeological reports both in printed articles (available through JStor) and
                  the detailed materials on the NYU excavators website<note><title><xref url="http://www.nyu.edu/projects/aphrodisias/">Aphrodisias
                     Excavations</xref></title>, (April 2006).</note> and elsewhere.</p>
               <p>In this paper, I shall use the example of the Inscriptions of Aphrodisias project
                  and the particular needs and opportunities of its publication to argue for what I
                  believe are some of the most promising possibilities of electronic publication.
                  There will also be some discussion of the hazards and shortfalls of this approach,
                  and ways in which we can address them. Although not yet a complete replacement for
                  traditional printed books, digital publications are an unavoidable part of modern
                  scholarship, and we owe it to ourselves to be as familiar as possible with the
                  issues surrounding research and publication in this medium.</p>
               <div>
                  <head>References</head>
                  <listBibl>
                     <bibl>ALPSP, ed. <date>2002</date>. <title level="m">Authors and electronic
                        publishing</title>.</bibl>
                     <bibl><title>Aphrodisias Excavations</title>. &lt;<xref url="http://www.nyu.edu/projects/aphrodisias/">http://www.nyu.edu/projects/aphrodisias/</xref>&gt; (April
                           <date>2006</date>)</bibl>
                     <bibl><author>Clarke, J.</author> <date>2001</date>. <title level="a">Questions raised by electronic publication in archaeology</title>,
                           <title level="s">BAR International Series</title> 931: 351-6.</bibl>
                     <bibl><author>Kasdorf, W.</author> <date>2003</date>. <title level="m">The
                           Columbia guide to digital publishing</title>. Columbia University Press.</bibl>
                     <bibl><author>Marnett, L.</author> <date>2005</date>. <title level="a">The
                           impact of electronic publication</title>. <title level="j">Chemical
                           Research in Toxicology</title> 18: 1-2.</bibl>
                     <bibl><author>Roueché, Charlotte</author>. <date>1989</date>. <title level="m">Aphrodisias in Late Antiquity</title>. London: Roman Society Monographs.</bibl>
                     <bibl><author>Roueché, Charlotte</author>. <date>2004</date>. <title level="m">Aphrodisias in Late Antiquity</title>. &lt;<xref url="http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/ala2004/">http://insaph.kcl.ac.uk/ala2004/</xref>&gt; revised electronic
                        edition.</bibl>
                  </listBibl>
               </div>
            </body>
         </text>
      </group>
   </text>
</TEI.2>

